The Impact of Investment Fees

Over time, those little mutual fund charges can really pinch you.

Funds come with fees. In fact, so do IRAs, 529 plans, brokerage accounts and many other types of investments. Over time, the impact of these little fees is significant.

Back in 2006, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) studied 401(k) plan fees and found that just a 1% increase in these fees could whittle a worker’s 401(k) savings down by 17% across 20 years.1 How would you like to have 17% less retirement money?

Fees are inevitable, but it pays to shop around. When you think of the compounding and potential annual gains that 1% or 2% of your current fund balances could enjoy over 10 or 20 years, you see how fees matter. No mutual fund or retirement plan is going to operate for free, but trying to minimize fees could help you save more and retain more for retirement and other goals.

Expense ratios. The proper name for a mutual fund fee is the expense ratio. (The expense ratio represents the total operational cost of running the fund.) You can find mutual funds with expense ratios as low as 0.10% … and you can find others with expense ratios above 3.0%. Hence the popularity of institutional no-load funds, which commonly have expense ratios in the 0.1%-0.7% range. INLF also have no minimums, while you can find mutual funds with minimums of $50,000.2,3 However, these types of funds are not available to the public, you have to go through an investor coach to get them. 

Why are some mutual fund expense ratios so high? Here are some contributing factors.

12b-1 fees. Most investors have no idea what these are, but they are common even among funds offered through discount brokerages. A 12b-1 fee is a fee used to pay the company or brokerage through which you buy fund shares. Mutual fund investors paid around $9.5 billion worth of these fees in 2009.4

An example: let’s say you happen to buy into a fund via a discount brokerage. You may be assessed a 12b-1 fee, usually 0.25% (though it can run as high as 1.0%). Charging you a 0.25% fee helps to cover the typical 0.4%-of-shares cost that the fund pays out to the brokerage. A “no-load” fund can still have up to a 0.25% 12b-1 fee.4

Loads. In addition, many mutual funds ding investors with loads. There are front end loads (entry fees) on A share mutual funds and back end loads (surrender charges) on B share mutual funds. This can be 4-6%.

Transaction fees. Brokerages commonly charge these fees when they get a buy or sell order. These fees often run $10-50 per trade at a full-service brokerage, less at a discount brokerage. If you aren’t selling or buying big, these fees can really pinch you.  

Custodian/account fees. IRAs charge custodian fees (to help them pay for IRS reporting expenses) and mutual funds can charge annual account maintenance fees. Annually, these charges are usually under $100 in each instance – but think how much even $30 or $60 could grow and compound through the years.   

Turnover Cost.  “These trading costs are very real. While it’s very important to look at that expense ratio, it’s just not going to capture all of the costs. Trading costs for stock funds total 2% to 3% percent of assets annually, though  conservative estimates place them closer to 1%.” -Stephen Horan, CFA Institute, Wall Street Journal, March 2010

Read that fund prospectus. It isn’t exactly light reading, but you can usually find the expense table in short order. Fund fees and turnover are always worth checking out – and if you don’t understand what a fee represents, ask an investor coach.

Citations
1 – usatoday.com/money/perfi/retirement/2010-06-15-401k-fees-disclosure_N.htm [6/15/10]
2 – fool.com/investing/etf/index.aspx [7/9/10]
3 – fool.com/investing/etf/mutual-funds-v-etfs.aspx [7/9/10]
4 – online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704009804575309011863641700.html [7/6/10]

This information should not be construed as investment advice. Neither the named Representative nor Broker/Dealer gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If other expert assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. Please consult your Financial Advisor for further information.  This material was prepared by Peter Montoya Inc., for Stonecreek Wealth Advisors, Inc., a fee only registered investment advisor firm in Salt Lake City, Utah.  Mark Lund is the author of The Effective Investor.

Category: Newsletters

About the Author ()

Mark K. Lund is the author of The Effective Investor, a #1 Best Seller, and founder of Stonecreek Wealth Advisors, Inc. an independent, fee-only, Registered Investment Advisory firm. He has provided articles for or been quoted in: The Wall Street Journal, The Salt Lake Tribune, The Enterprise Newspaper, The Utah Business Connect Magazine, US News & World Report, and Newsmax.com, just to name a few.  Mark publishes two newsletters called, “The Mark Lund Growth Report” and “Mark Lund on Money.”  Mark provides CPE (continuing professional education) courses for CPAs.  You may also have seen him on KUTV Channel 2, or as a guest speaker at a local association or business. Mark provides investment and retirement planning services for individuals and 401(k) consulting for small businesses. In his book, The Effective Investor, Mark exposes the false narrative magazines, media, big Wall Street firms, and most advisors want you to believe. The good news is that Mark will show you that you don’t need their speculative ways of investing in order to be a successful investor. Get a free copy when you schedule your initial consultation.

Comments are closed.